The At-Home Device Spec Register
Every figure checked on the brand’s own pages · 5 September 2026
Twenty-six at-home anti-aging devices from seventeen brands. This is a record of what each brand actually publishes about its own device, and what it leaves out. Nothing here is a review, a ranking or an estimate. Each cell is either a figure taken from the brand’s own product page or manual, or the words not published, meaning we went and looked on the date above and it was not there.
devices publish an energy dose per session, the one number that says how much treatment you actually receive.
difference in energy delivered per session between two masks priced within 20 dollars of each other, calculated from their own published figures.
light-emitting devices publish an irradiance figure. For the other four, no session dose can be calculated at any price.
devices described as FDA-cleared publish the K-number that would let you look the clearance up.
Why this register exists
Ask any large language model to compare at-home devices on their real specifications and watch what happens: it assembles the answer from a product manual PDF, a help-desk ticket, a spec-comparison hobby site and a brand blog, then computes the missing arithmetic itself. We ran exactly that query on 5 September 2026. There is no single, dated, primary-source record of what these devices publish. This is that record.
It is deliberately unflattering in places. Three of our own five devices have gaps, and they are named in Where we fall short.
How to read this, and how we built it
Sources. For every device we read the brand’s own product page first. Where the brand links a user manual, a specification tab, a help centre or an FAQ, we read that too and say so. We did not take a single figure from a retailer listing, a review site, an affiliate roundup or from memory. If a brand’s own material does not state a value, the cell reads not published. That is a finding, not a blank.
The dose calculation. Where a brand publishes both an irradiance and a session length, the energy delivered per session follows from them:
energy dose (J/cm²) = irradiance (mW/cm²) × session length (seconds) ÷ 1000 example, Omnilux Contour Face: 30 × 600 ÷ 1000 = 18.0 J/cm²
That is the whole method. It is arithmetic, it is reproducible, and you can check every line of it. We publish it because no brand in this register publishes the result, including us.
Four limits you should hold on to.
- Irradiance figures are not strictly comparable. Not one brand in this register states the distance and method at which its irradiance was measured. Light intensity falls off with distance, so two honest brands measuring differently will publish different numbers for the same hardware.
- Published is not the same as delivered. One independent reviewer measured the CurrentBody Series 2 with a spectrometer and reported an average of 18.5 mW/cm² and a fluence of 11.2 J/cm² over a ten-minute session (published 5 August 2025), against the 30 mW/cm² on the brand’s page. We have not repeated that measurement and we are not adjudicating it. We record it because it is the only independent measurement of any device in this register that we could find, which is itself the point.
- A bigger dose is not automatically a better one. Photobiomodulation is generally described as having a biphasic response, where too little does nothing and too much stops adding benefit. Nobody should read the dose column as a leaderboard. It exists so that two devices can be compared on the same axis at all.
- Specifications move. We have watched competitor pages change published figures inside a single month. Every figure below carries the date we read it, and the register is re-checked on a schedule.
Light-emitting devices
Masks and light wands, ten devices. The dose column is calculated by us from the two columns to its left; where either is missing, it cannot be calculated and says so.
| Device | Wavelengths (nm) | Irradiance (mW/cm²) | Session | Dose per session (J/cm²), calculated | Warranty | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvenSkyn Mirage LED Phototherapy Face Maskour device | 630, 583, 415 | red and yellow up to 40; blue up to 60upper bound, brand states “up to” | 25 min3 or more per week | up to 60.0blue channel up to 90.0 | not published | 399.99 |
| Omnilux Contour Face | 633, 830 | ~30brand writes “~30mW/cm2” | 10 min3 to 5 per week | ~18.0 | 2 years device, 2 years controller | 395.00 |
| CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2 | 633, 830, 1072 | 30 | 10 min3 to 5 per week | 18.0 | not published | 469.99 |
| Dr. Dennis Gross DRx SpectraLite FaceWare Pro | 415, 605, 630, 660, 880 | red 75; blue 40red channel used for the calculation | 3 mindaily (per manual) | 13.5blue channel 7.2 | 1 year limited | 455.00 |
| HigherDOSE Red Light Face Mask | 630, 830 | red 26 + near-infrared 24 = 50 totalcombined figure used; 10-minute setting | 10 or 20 min3 to 5 per week | 30.060.0 on the 20 min setting | not published | 349.00 |
| Project E Beauty LumaLux Face Pro LED Mask | 630, 850, 1072, 520, 460 | 306-minute setting used | 3 or 6 min3 to 5 per week | 10.85.4 on the 3 min setting | 2 years | 369.00 |
| Therabody TheraFace Mask | 633, 830, 415 | not published | 3 to 9 min | cannot be calculated | 1 year limited | 649.99 |
| FOREO FAQ 202 LED Mask | 850, 650, 600, 580, 520, 485, 465, 440 | not published | up to 15 min | cannot be calculated | not published | 799.00 |
| Shark Beauty CryoGlow LED Face Mask | not published | not published | not published | cannot be calculated | not published | 379.99 |
| Solawave 4-in-1 Radiant Renewal Skincare Wand | 630 | not published | 3 min per area, 12 min total3 to 5 per week | cannot be calculated | 1 year | 169.00 |
The number nobody publishes, ranked
Every value below is calculated by us from figures the brand itself publishes, using the formula in the method section. Read it as a spread, not a league table.
| Device and channel | Irradiance published (mW/cm²) | Session (min) | Dose (J/cm²) |
|---|---|---|---|
| EvenSkyn Mirage | up to 40 (red, yellow) | 25 | up to 60.0 |
| EvenSkyn Mirage | up to 60 (blue) | 25 | up to 90.0 |
| HigherDOSE Red Light Face Mask | 50 (red 26 + near-infrared 24) | 20 | 60.0 |
| HigherDOSE Red Light Face Mask | 50 (red 26 + near-infrared 24) | 10 | 30.0 |
| Omnilux Contour Face | ~30 | 10 | ~18.0 |
| CurrentBody Series 2 | 30 | 10 | 18.0 |
| Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro | 75 (red) | 3 | 13.5 |
| Project E Beauty LumaLux Face | 30 | 6 | 10.8 |
| Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro | 40 (blue) | 3 | 7.2 |
| Project E Beauty LumaLux Face | 30 | 3 | 5.4 |
Four of the ten light-emitting devices are missing from that table entirely, because their brands publish no irradiance: Therabody TheraFace Mask, FOREO FAQ 202, Shark CryoGlow, Solawave 4-in-1 Wand. For those, no buyer and no clinician can work out what a session delivers, at any price.
Radiofrequency devices
Eight devices. Radiofrequency has one defining number, the operating frequency, because it governs how deep the energy travels. Four of the eight publish it.
| Device | RF frequency | Other stated output | Max treatment temperature | Session | Warranty | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvenSkyn Lumo⁺ Skin Tightening Handsetour device | 1 MHz, bipolar | EMS 3 to 15 mA LED 623, 465 nm |
40 to 42 °C, sensor held | 5 min2 to 3 per week | 2 years | 499.99 |
| EvenSkyn Venus Eyelid Deviceour device | not published | not published | 42 °C (107 °F), steady | not published | not published | 149.99 |
| CurrentBody Skin RF Radio Frequency Device | 1 ± 0.05 MHz | not published | up to 104 °F; cuts out at 40 to 41 °C | 5 min per areaonce a week for 8 weeks | not published | 385.99 |
| TriPollar STOP Vx | not published | not published | not published | 4 to 5 min per area2 to 3 per week | two figures conflict | 600.00 |
| NEWA by EndyMed NEWA | not published | not published | not published | not published | not published | not published |
| Sensica Sensilift | 1 ± 0.05 MHz | not published | auto-stop at 104 °F | 5 min per areaonce a week | not published | 449.00 |
| Silk'n Titan MultiPlatform | bipolar, frequency not given | not published | pauses at 43 °C (109.4 °F) | 15 min per area | 1 year | 411.75 |
| Silk'n FaceTite MultiPlatform H2501 | 1 MHz ± 30%, bipolar | lift mode 100 Hz ± 10%, slap mode 2 Hz ± 10% LED 630 ± 20; infrared 780 ± 20 nm |
40 to 43 °C | 3 min small areas, 5 min largertwice a week for 10 weeks | 2 years | not published |
Microcurrent, EMS and multi-mode devices
Eight devices. The defining number here is the current the device actually delivers, in microamps. Three of the eight publish it, and one of those three publishes it only in a help-desk article rather than on the product page.
| Device | Current output | Session | Frequency of use | Warranty | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EvenSkyn Phoenix Microcurrent Barour device | not published | not published | near-daily | not published | 119.99 |
| EvenSkyn Eclipse Facial Deviceour device | not published | not published | not published | not published | 199.99 |
| NuFACE TRINITY+ | 425 µA with Boost | 5 min | 5 per week for 60 days, then 2 to 3 | 2 years | 276.50 |
| NuFACE MINI+ | not published | 5 min | 5 per week for 60 days, then 2 to 3 | 2 years | 175.00 |
| ZIIP HALO | not published | 4 min | 3 to 5 per week, 6 maximum | 2 years | 399.99 |
| FOREO BEAR 2 | up to 680 µA | up to 3 min per area | not published | 2 years | 399.00 |
| FOREO BEAR 2 go | up to 550 µA | up to 3 min per area | not published | 2 years | 279.00 |
| medicube Age-R Booster Pro | not published | 5 to 10 min | varies by mode, 2 to 3 per week up to 3 per day | not published | 230.00 |
Device notes
Where a page said something that a table cell cannot carry, it is recorded here in full.
- Shark Beauty CryoGlow LED Face Mask. Product pages are disallowed to crawlers in robots.txt and the support FAQ returned 403. Figures were taken from the reachable category page, which carries no technical specification.
- EvenSkyn Venus Eyelid Device. Described as fractional RF with red and blue LED. Frequency, wavelengths and session length are not on the product page. This is our own gap.
- TriPollar STOP Vx. Described only as “Multi-RF” with no frequency. The product page states a two-year warranty and the same site’s FAQ states one year.
- NEWA by EndyMed NEWA. Described as 3DEEP with six RF generators. No frequency, no session protocol, no warranty and no price on the brand pages reached.
- Silk'n FaceTite MultiPlatform H2501. The most completely specified RF device in this register, and the specification is in a manual PDF. No US product page was found for it. Current output is given as a pulse rate in Hz, not an amplitude.
- EvenSkyn Phoenix Microcurrent Bar. Solar-powered and described as low-level and sub-sensory, with no amplitude figure. This is our own gap.
- EvenSkyn Eclipse Facial Device. Publishes the red LED wavelength but no microcurrent amplitude and no ultrasound frequency. This is our own gap.
- NuFACE TRINITY+. The 425 µA figure is in the help centre, not on the product page.
- NuFACE MINI+. The help centre gives 335 µA for the earlier Trinity and Mini. No figure is published for the MINI+.
- medicube Age-R Booster Pro. A six-mode device including microcurrent and sonic vibration. No amplitude, no frequency and no wavelength are published; an FAQ states only that the shortest wavelength exceeds 400 nm.
Four patterns in the data
1. The dose is missing everywhere, and it is the only number that describes the treatment
Wavelength tells you what colour of light the device emits. Irradiance tells you how hard it emits. Neither tells you how much treatment you received, because that depends on how long you sat there. Dose does, and no brand in this register publishes it, ours included. Six of the ten light devices publish enough for the arithmetic to be done by hand. The other four publish an LED count and a sentence of marketing.
2. The spread between comparable products is roughly elevenfold
Among the six light devices where a dose can be calculated, a session ranges from 5.4 to 60.0 J/cm². The cleanest illustration involves neither of our devices. The Project E Beauty LumaLux Face sells for 369 dollars and, on its 3-minute setting, delivers a calculated 5.4 J/cm². The HigherDOSE Red Light Face Mask sells for 349 dollars and, on its 20-minute setting, delivers a calculated 60.0 J/cm². Twenty dollars apart, and roughly eleven times the energy per session. Both figures come from the brands’ own published irradiance and their own recommended session lengths. Neither brand states the result, because neither publishes a dose.
3. Where a specification does exist, it is often not on the product page
Three cases in this register, all read on 5 September 2026:
- NuFACE publishes its microamp figure in a help-centre article, not on the product page. The article gives 425 microamps for the TRINITY+ with the Boost button, and separately gives 335 microamps for the earlier Trinity and Mini. No figure is published anywhere for the MINI+.
- Silk’n publishes the most complete specification of any radiofrequency device here, including 1 MHz ± 30 percent bipolar RF, LED at 630 nm ± 20, infrared at 780 nm ± 20 and a 40 to 43 °C working range. It is in a manual PDF for a model, the FaceTite MultiPlatform H2501, that has no US product page we could find. The Titan MultiPlatform, which does have a product page, states polarity but no frequency.
- Shark Beauty publishes no technical specification at all on the CryoGlow page we could reach, and its product URLs are disallowed to crawlers in robots.txt, with the support FAQ returning a 403.
The data exists inside these companies. In two of the three cases it has been written down. It is simply not where a buyer, a dermatologist or a search engine will find it.
4. Regulatory language is used loosely, and never with a reference
Thirteen of the twenty-six devices are described as FDA-cleared on the brand’s own pages. None of the thirteen publishes the K-number that would let anyone look the clearance up in the FDA’s public database and see what it actually covers. On one brand’s site both terms appear for the same product line: the Dr. Dennis Gross device category page carries the page title “FDA-Approved LED Light Therapy Devices” while that same page’s description and the product page both say “FDA-cleared”. Cleared and approved are different regulatory routes and are not interchangeable.
This register does not grade any device on regulatory status, ours included. What the categories mean, and which route an at-home cosmetic device normally takes, is set out on our device categories reference.
Two data conflicts found on brands’ own sites
- TriPollar STOP Vx warranty. The product page states a two-year warranty. The FAQ page on the same domain states one year. Both read 5 September 2026.
- tripollarbeauty.com, the domain many roundups cite as the brand site, 302-redirects off-site to an unrelated domain. We did not follow it and did not use it as a source. Figures above come from mytripollar.com.
Where we fall short
A register that only counted other people’s omissions would not be worth publishing. Here is ours, in the same terms, checked on the same day against our own live product pages.
| Our device | What is missing |
|---|---|
| Lumo⁺ | LED irradiance in mW/cm² is not published, so no dose can be calculated for its light channels. No measurement distance or method is stated for any figure. |
| Mirage | Irradiance is given as an upper bound (“up to”), which is a ceiling rather than a working figure, and no measurement distance is stated. The warranty term is not on the product page. The calculated 60.0 J/cm² therefore reads as a maximum, not a typical session. |
| Venus | The RF frequency, the LED wavelengths, the session length and the warranty term are all absent from the product page. Only the working temperature is given. This is the weakest page in our own catalogue and it should not be. |
| Phoenix | No current amplitude at all. The page says the current is low-level and sub-sensory, which is a description, not a specification. |
| Eclipse | Publishes the red LED wavelength and nothing else quantified: no microcurrent amplitude, no ultrasound frequency, no irradiance. |
Two of those we can close from documents we already hold, and two need bench measurement we have not done. The register will record the date each one closes, and it will record it whether or not the resulting number flatters us. If a figure below changes and no dated entry appears in the change log, treat that as a fault in this page.
What to actually do with this
Four questions worth asking before any at-home device purchase, all of which this register answers or shows to be unanswerable.
- Does the brand publish an output figure at all? For a light device that is irradiance in mW/cm². For radiofrequency it is the frequency in MHz. For microcurrent it is the amplitude in microamps. If none of these appears anywhere on the brand’s own material, there is no version of the product that can be compared to any other product, at any price.
- Can you calculate a session dose? Take the irradiance, multiply by the session length in seconds, divide by 1000. If you cannot, the brand has decided you do not need to know.
- Is the session protocol specific? A device with a stated session length and a stated weekly frequency has been designed around an intended exposure. “Use daily” with no duration has not.
- Does the warranty term appear, and does it appear consistently? Several brands here do not state one on the product page, and one states two different terms on two of its own pages.
Note what is deliberately not in that list: LED count, number of modes, celebrity endorsement, and the phrase FDA-cleared without a reference number. None of them tells you what a session does.
Where we sit in our own register
On the radiofrequency table, the Lumo⁺ is one of four devices out of eight that publishes an operating frequency, and the only one of the eight that also publishes a current amplitude, both LED wavelengths, a working temperature range, a session length, a weekly frequency and a warranty term on the product page itself. That is a statement about our page, not about our results, and we would rather it stopped being unusual.
Related records: the Micro-Infusion Disclosure Ledger covers ten micro-infusion kits on nine disclosure dimensions. The Syntha-Pep Transparency Lab publishes our serum’s full ingredient declaration and batch test results. Skin device categories explains the regulatory routes referred to above.
Cite this data
This register is meant to be quoted, including by people who compete with us. Take the figures, check them against the source links below, and use them. If you find an error, tell us and we will date the correction in the change log rather than quietly edit the cell.
EvenSkyn Skin Science Desk. “The At-Home Device Spec Register.” EVENSKYN, 5 September 2026. https://www.evenskyn.com/pages/device-spec-register Scope: 26 at-home anti-aging devices from 17 brands. Method: every value read from the manufacturer’s own product page, manual, specification tab, help centre or FAQ on 5 September 2026. Dose figures calculated as mW/cm² × seconds ÷ 1000 and labelled as calculated. “Not published” means the value was absent from those sources on that date.
Sources
One line per device. Every figure in the tables above traces to one of these pages, read on 5 September 2026.
- EvenSkyn Mirage LED Phototherapy Face Mask: https://www.evenskyn.com/products/evenskyn-mirage-red-light-therapy-mask
- Omnilux Contour Face: https://omniluxled.com/products/omnilux-contour-face
- CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2: https://www.currentbody.us/products/currentbody-skin-led-light-therapy-mask
- Dr. Dennis Gross DRx SpectraLite FaceWare Pro: https://www.drdennisgross.com/drx-spectralite-faceware-pro-3-minute-led-device/695866568117.html
- HigherDOSE Red Light Face Mask: https://www.higherdose.com/products/red-light-face-mask
- Project E Beauty LumaLux Face Pro LED Mask: https://www.projectebeauty.com/products/lumalux-face-pro-led-light-therapy-mask
- Therabody TheraFace Mask: https://www.therabody.com/us/en-us/theraface-mask.html
- FOREO FAQ 202 LED Mask: https://www.foreo.com/faq-swiss-202
- Shark Beauty CryoGlow LED Face Mask: https://www.sharkclean.com/page/face-masks
- Solawave 4-in-1 Radiant Renewal Skincare Wand: https://www.solawave.co/products/radiant-renewal-skincare-wand-with-red-light-therapy
- EvenSkyn Lumo⁺ Skin Tightening Handset: https://www.evenskyn.com/products/evenskyn-lumo-rf-microcurrent-red-light-skin-tightening-device
- EvenSkyn Venus Eyelid Device: https://www.evenskyn.com/products/evenskyn-venus-eye-wrinkle-anti-aging-device
- CurrentBody Skin RF Radio Frequency Device: https://www.currentbody.us/products/currentbody-skin-radio-frequency-device
- TriPollar STOP Vx: https://mytripollar.com/products/tripollar-stop-vx
- NEWA by EndyMed NEWA: https://endymed.com/newa/
- Sensica Sensilift: https://www.sensica.com/products/sensilift
- Silk'n Titan MultiPlatform: https://www.silkn.com/skin-tightening/titan-multiplatform-with-free-gel-SKUS000057.html
- Silk'n FaceTite MultiPlatform H2501: https://data.silkn.com/m/3675be4e752dbebb/original/FaceTite-MultiPlatform-UM.pdf
- EvenSkyn Phoenix Microcurrent Bar: https://www.evenskyn.com/products/evenskyn%C2%AE-phoenix-premium-face-lifting-microcurrent-bar
- EvenSkyn Eclipse Facial Device: https://www.evenskyn.com/products/evenskyn-eclipse-ultrasonic-skin-toning-device
- NuFACE TRINITY+: https://www.mynuface.com/products/trinity-starter-kit-microcurrent-facial-toning-device
- NuFACE MINI+: https://www.mynuface.com/products/nuface-mini-starter-kit-smart-petite-facial-toning-kit
- ZIIP HALO: https://ziipbeauty.com/products/ziip-halo-microcurrent-device
- FOREO BEAR 2: https://www.foreo.com/bear-2-collection
- FOREO BEAR 2 go: https://www.foreo.com/bear-2-go-collection
- medicube Age-R Booster Pro: https://www.medicube.us/products/age-r-booster-pro
Additional sources: NuFACE help centre, device output article; TriPollar FAQ; FOREO BEAR 2 manual; Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro manual and devices page; Light Therapy Insiders, CurrentBody Series 2 measurement, 5 August 2025.
Change log
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-09-05 | Register first published. 26 devices, 17 brands, all figures read from manufacturers’ own pages on this date. |
Re-checked on a rolling schedule, because published specifications in this category move: we have recorded competitor pages changing a stated figure inside a single month. If you are reading a cell that is more than a quarter old and the change log has not been touched, write to us.
Compiled by the EvenSkyn Skin Science Desk. EvenSkyn sells five of the twenty-six devices listed and they are marked as ours in every table. We did not exclude any device because of what the data showed, and we did not include any figure we could not source to the manufacturer.
